In
the U.S. election 2016, surprisingly Donald Trump was elected as a new
president. This result astonished a lot of people because the previous poll
surveys predicted Trump’s lose (Kirk & Scott, 2016). These days,
predicting public emotions by ordinary ways such as telephone interviews or
face-to-face survey seems to be much more difficult than before due to the
growing complexity of the social elements like the widespread use of mobile
phones, the hidden distrust of media coverages or concerns about privacy
violation. One media report that the incredible victory hugely attributed to
the hidden supporters who were not willing to express their tendency toward
Trump (“Trump campaign,” 2016). On the contrary, analyzing social networking
services might have a significant potential power to reveal the true
sentimental values among people on particular topics, which might change the
survey style in the near future.
Nowadays,
not only the U.S., but also many countries are forced to deal with the
unprecedented and sometimes unstable progress. For example, the America’s old
friend, U.K., also experienced the painful detachment from EU called “Briexit”,
which nobody had anticipated the realization until the results turned out. It
is said that some of the avid supporters for it could not have imagined the
results, which is called “Bregret” (Dearden, 2016).
It is
not too much to say that the world is now facing with rapid upcoming of a new
order. What is, if any, the main cause of those unpredictable events?
Generally, big changes stem from big impulses. If so, there must be some kind
of the emerging power which created the current unstable situation. In this
thesis, the measurement for how Syrian refugee crisis from early 2015 has
affected the U.K. society is offered in order to glimpse the entire influence
of the calamity
When it
comes to thinking about the displaced people, the important thing is that the
media coverages have played an important role to pervade those events around
the world. This means their influence has the crucial power not only to report
the problem, but also to build up the public images or opinions which sometimes
change the course of the political decision on particular matters.
The
main objective of this paper is to find out how the media trends have changed
by critical events and what kind of influence the shifting seems to have on the
public reaction toward refugees or politics. For appraising the media trend,
articles on BBC news website were analyzed by three sentimental tools. Additionally,
with regard to verifying those effects, “Syrian refugee crisis” was chosen as a
primal topic for evaluation because the tragic event has several notable features.
One is that recently, especially in European countries, there have been serious
concerns about immigrants from Muslim nations. What is more, some people there
feel that those people might change their cultures entirely based on the sharia
law. On the other hand, there are always heartfelt supports from the local
citizens to those new comers. The coexistence of those two groups seems to create
other problems in their countries that is worth to scrutinizing.
The
motivation for choosing those subjects comes from the fact that many people
these days begin to think the media reports are not reliable enough (“Further decline,”
2012). Therefore, “Syrian refugee crisis” could be a perfect
example to exemplify how the public reactions are effected by the media
coverages. Moreover, the historical tragedies include many aspects which the
world today is facing with. For example, multiculturalism, Islamization,
anti-immigrant sentiment, and social matters like that. The aim of this study
is chiefly to show how the public emotions towards the refugee crisis have
changed over a period of time and what influence the media coverages have
attributed to them. Besides, the evaluations of the reliabilities of the sentimental
analysis tools which have been developed to analyze the various social tendency
including the media trend were conducted as well.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿