Likewise,
many researchers confirm that the 2003 thesis submitted by Nasukawa and Yi (Nasukawa &
Jeonghee) used the term “Sentimental analysis” first.[1] In the report, they show
how to extract the sentiments and divide them into “Positive” and “Negative”.
The survey, unlike the previous two examples, treats many sentences of various
domains from news article to camera reviews on the web pages in order to find
out the way to pave the new linguistic approach. In the last part of the paper,
they concluded that the more difficult the target documents, which are news
articles and descriptions in some official organizational Web pages, becomes,
the lower the precision rate goes. The main method which this paper used for
sentimental analysis on texts is A Part-Of-Speech Tagger (POS Tagger). POS
Tagger “is a piece of software that reads text in some language and assigns
parts of speech to each word (and other token), such as noun, verb, adjective,
etc.”[2] It seems that this
technology has widely adapted by several cognitive services or applications.
It
would also be noteworthy that both authors of this report are IBM’s staff.
Intriguingly, one of the previous thesis’s author “Shivakumar Vaithyanathan” is
also a staff from IBM research center. Those people’s untiring efforts would be
one of the reasons that IBM has recently been regarded as a leading company in
the cognitive system due to the creation of the revolutionary computer system
“Watson” which has offered many APIs including machine learning techniques to
the companies and concerned individuals. Among the features, what IBM Watson
provides is “AlchemyLanguage”, which enables us to analyze text and help us to
understand its sentiment, keywords, entities, high-level concepts and more.
Probably, the work by Nasukawa and Yi and other pioneers’ feats greatly
contributed to the progress of the “AlchemyLanguage”.
Title
is a crucial part for news articles and books which need to attract potential
readers’ interest. This short sentence has also been a hot field which many
researchers have devoted themselves to. According to Charles Grivel, title
functions can be divided into three categories; “to identify the work”, “to
designate its topic” and “to make the book stand out.” There seem to be general
acceptance of the sorting for title functions (Genette, 1997, p. 69). On the other hand,
some people raised an objection his theory. For instance, Gerard Genette, who
is a French literary theorist, insisted that the Grivel’s classifications for title are “not necessarily all
fulfilled at the same time”. Furthermore, he added that even though the first
one is a must, the other two are “optional or supplementary (Genette, 1997, p.
69).” In addition, Genette asserted that the role of title should be
parted into “thematic” and “formal”. These days, the combination of Text
analysis and Sentimental analysis has led to new discoveries. For one thing, it
is found that negative news headlines get much more reader’s attention, which
is the third title function Grivel invented, than positive ones (“Psychology: Why bad”,
2014). This surprising fact hidden under our feet was revealed
thanks to the technical collaboration. Also, this partnership is applied to
assess the media trend over the certain social issues. The paper led by Erik
Bleich (Bleich,
Nisar, and Abdelhamid, 2015) successfully uncovered the unique
media tendency of the news coverages on Islam and Muslims by conducting Sentimental
investigation on New York times’ news headlines related to the topics. This
survey greatly contributes to this research process. In fact, some of the
method this paper use are referred from Bleich’s study.
The
rapid increase Internet diffusion rate enabled researchers to collect massive
data required for calculate social phenomenon. The technics has now been used
not only by scholars who hope to verify their theories, but also by companies
which want to monitor the customers’ feelings or complains about their products
more accurately. In recent years, the heated demands for analysis on people’s
latent minds and the accumulated legacies incredibly accelerated technological
innovation. As a result, it has hugely broaden the usage of Sentimental analysis
from finance to politics.
Financial
themes have always been a popular subject in “Sentimental analysis”. So far, a
numerous number of economic treatises connected to the emotional evaluation
have been proposed. It seems that the monetary scholarly field has quickly
accepted this new style because the markets have a long history to cherish the miscellaneous
data for the prediction of the stock movement. The data is called
“Fundamentals”[3]
and “Sentimental analysis” has smoothly mingled with them. In fact, as this
thesis mentioned earlier, the leading paper for “Sentimental analysis” was
about stock prediction using this method (Yahoo! for Amazon, 2004). Since
then, there are a lot of theories proposed concerning the evaluation for the
market trend.
Johan
Bollen and his team’s thesis in 2010 (Bollen & Huina & Xiao-Jun, 2010)
is well cited and it achieves more than 2000 times quotations from other
studies according to “Google Scholar”. In Bollen’s research, they proved that
sentiments of the sentences on Twitter clearly have something to do with the
value of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). They used two mood tracking
tools for their survey; one is “OpinionFinder” which measures positive or
negative and the other is “Google-Profile of Mood States (GPOMS) that measures
mood in terms of 6 dimensions (Calm, Alert, Sure, Vital, Kind, and Happy)”.
Eventually, they reported that the overall accuracy to predict the value of
DJIA reached as high as 86.7%.
The utilizations
of “Sentimental Analysis” encompass tangled political matters such as “poll
survey” that is one of the topics for this thesis. Nowadays, SNS tools are the
primary places for the estimation of political sentiments among public mind. Out
of many communication services, Twitter is presumably more chosen for the
analysis due to its outstanding feature that set the 140-character limitation for
each posting on every user. This function enabled researchers to collect and
inspect the target materials easier and faster because those texts were much
shorter and clearer than the descriptions of conventional blogs or homepages.
(However, Twitter announced the abolishment of the system in May, 2016) What is
more, according to the research conducted by Tom Jackson and Martin Sykora who
are professors and lecturer of Loughborough University, analyzing emotions on
Twitter suggested Donald Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton for “The United
States presidential election of 2016” (Jackson & Sykora, 2016). This amazing
discovery implies not only the premonition for the new dawn of the outmoded
classic polling system but also the possibility for the innovation of other
long-established customs. Traditional survey theories for voters’ phycology
status like “Bando wagon” and “Underdog effect” might be able to be more
sophisticated by cooperating with “Sentimental Analysis”
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿